This is a film that has puzzled me a lot. Not for the work itself, as in the Academy's choice to appoint him as the best film. Nothing to remove the always excellent Queen Amidala (Natalie Portman alias), which fully deserved the statuette for best actress for her extraordinary performance obtained, but all the rest. I take much pleasure.
Knowing that this film was the mental illness of a dancer who discovered the darker side of himself interpreting the black swan of the famous ballet had intrigued me greatly, and perhaps the one hand there might point out that I had actually made too many expectations.
But too many things I did not go down.
First of all Aronofsky's directorial style, which goes from dirty shots and bobbing (useful in a film like "The wrestler", but definitely not here) to those of real life perfectly clean and balanced phase dream. What can andarmi good for a movie like "Dancer in the Dark" by Von Trier, but in a film as this, where reality and fiction (with) merge, gave me a lot of discomfort. I would also add that the metamorphosis into a swan - those who have seen means - the Portman seemed to me quite ridicolette.
The formula 'but no matter what stories you tell as' then falls into the aesthetic failure reported in the previous paragraph.
not forget the character of the Portman ... beyond the beautiful proof of the actress, it seemed a paucity of disarming. It does not have its psychological basis, things happen because they happen (when in fact even the madness has its own logic). Some particular relatively large (I seemed to understand that has never been very healthy pumpkin) just mentioned, and so on. A really poor and insipid, saved by the talented actress who has played ... moral of the story, there was (for me) the necessary empathy with the protagonist. Ah then, the mother reminded me of the worst characters in Lynch, I do not know why ...
A story that then he knew he had seen since the days of Poe, then imagine the millennium where even Stephen King bestseller world apart, he began to have its annexes. And to take it forward to say that there were three (three destroyers! Three!) Writers. To this end we combine a quite predictable that has no utility unless to give you the opportunity to say: "Ah, I had understood from dal'inizio that ended well." I'm not saying I wanted a plot supermegaiperinnovativa, but more consistently so.
And this should not be the best film of 2010? But please!
0 comments:
Post a Comment