Low Hard Cervix For 2 Weeks

What sin. can do



I have never endured the dictionary of synonyms and antonyms. Not so much the contrary, in the broadest sense, have their dignity. The problem is the synonym. Fucking synonyms.
What centers the art and fashion with a synonym? Well, then this post is about useless anticipate no;)?!

We're going to the basis of speech: what the heck is a synonym? The dictionary says it is a word that differs slightly from another.

Words exist to describe things and to express ideas, and each of these words has a precise meaning that justifies its existence. Each word must exist thus have a precise meaning that differs from any other.
not hard to see why the concept of "synonym" face water from all sides: a word that is different from another even to a slight gradient, means exactly that is to indicate something different!

The answer seems simple: it is simply convenient to use synonyms. And I say that is just bullshit (here's an example, I use "stupid" or "stupid", but "bullshit" has the power of foul language, other words that do not have).

Crush words close to each other, flattening the meaning, you look at the world so trivial. It 's like using a black and white television, despite the network transmits color.

Every decade of the twentieth century had its innovation in the arts, in that fashion to a very strong and clear.
With the arrival of the new millennium, we have seen nothing new. A continuous trend of the past recur, vintage mood, dusted off to give the appearance of an innovative process, a quote Read, a reinterpretation that is certainly made in full consciousness, and I like it, definitely.

But this continued recovery is the end of ideas? It 's a long period of stagnation? Or is the dawn of a new consciousness and artistic conception? Innovation is part of the language as it is with what we read the world, and with that we can innovate.

The importance of having a responsible and conscious language becomes apparent.

call things by their name. As Elizabeth says

Zamarchi, enrich the language has the powerful effect of enriching the thought. Only with this enrichment can be accessed with a reflective capacity capable of understand and innovate the world today.

Oh yes, for those who do not know, hospitality is a constraint, then when you say "host" may be considered to be one which contains both the host;).

Jacopo

Safe Packaging For Cupcakes

Mondo interiore

Sunday afternoon at home in Verona. Finally a bit 'respite from the frenzy in Milan. A relaxing day, the air smells of autumn color, I drink hot tea and wearing pants in batteries, which combine to sleep and strangely also the desire to study or read something intoxicating.

Outside the window, her eyes caressing the willow tree in the garden, maple leaves cover the white iron table and chairs. I feel immersed in an impressionist painting. As I lose myself in these bohemian charm, I think of what an artist can be important for a work of art. The distinction seems simple: a work does not consist of the active presence of the creative (a painting does not require the intervention of the artist) and the expected performance of the enjoyment of the moment and the moment of creation to be the same.

An actor is a performance artist, a painter, body art is a performance artist, as well as a classical dancer, a musician and so on. Yet it is not always easy to tell whether a work needs the human presence, an act that is essential to artistic creation itself. A suit may be an artistic creation that does not require the presence of the artist in his "act" to contemporary "present" and yet the impact with the viewer is at a time when it is worn, when the ' Man gives life and completes the dress. It 's just at that moment that the dress becomes work? That is, when worn, expresses her beauty to the fullest potential? Again, not easy to answer.

There are many works of art that becomes even more difficult to understand whether the creative work is or is not integral, as the cuts in Fontana, conceptual works that are sufficient sun, but its lead as a key human action, a gash in the canvas. Rummaging around in my home in Verona, I found an old book of Joyce.

I've always loved the way James Joyce exceeds the photographic realism descriptions to focus on the thoughts of the beholder. Log on to the impressions, thoughts of the inner world of each character. It 's so that time becomes subjective, perceived differently by everyone. I think what is missing today is the lack of subjectivity, the point of view. It is not a criticism of the standardization and various crap, I'm not interested in (social phenomena rooted in socialization, against which it is useless to confront). I think what is needed is to restore the link between individual and world, between inner and world.

The recovery of the singularity of subjectivity, of experience, the interior is not easy. And 'necessary sensitivity suitable to receive the outside in these terms
When I say the world is math I can not help but feel that shiver of disgust.
Mathematics is read the world in a cold, consequential, predestined. For math there is optimism and pessimism. For math there is no doubt, and if there is no doubt, there are only undisputed truth. I refuse to read the world as a pathology.

I believe that everyone should discover and treat the artist who has inside. In a world that tends to stifle creativity in the number of provincial and bigoted view of a cold, according to which the work of the hoe and plow is the only thing worth having a dignity, we must first retrieve the man, so he can return to act, to be able to create performances post-modern man. Otherwise we will be remembered only as clusters of Excel spreadsheets and graphs to the crisis.

Jacopo